When a brand stops feeling like a brand, users notice long before the company does—and Google is now facing that subtle, dangerous drift.
Google didn’t rise to power because it was the biggest.
It rose because it was the cleanest, clearest, most user‑aligned place to start your search. A blank page. A box for search. No friction. No clutter. No sales pressure. Just relevance.
That wasn’t just a UX choice —
it was the embodiment of Google’s Brand ID:
- Who They Serve: Everyone seeking information
- Human Truth: We’re drowning in data but starving for relevance
- Their Solution: A search engine that delivers exactly what you need, instantly – in Maps, in Documents it held true.
- Personality: Smart. Minimalist. Helpful. Non-judgmental.
- Why It Worked: Radical user‑first simplicity that made the whole internet feel more usable.
And for years, that identity held.
But today, the experience of Google no longer maps cleanly to the simplicity and neutrality at the core of that brand.
Not because Google became “evil.”
But because the modern search page became something Google was never meant to be: busy, monetized, visually dense.
And users feel that.
The Full‑Circle Shift: When the Challenger Offers What the Incumbent Used to
We don’t have definitive data proving that Google is losing the upper funnel in absolute volume — Google still processes billions of informational searches daily, and according to 2025 data, informational queries remain the largest category on Google (52.65%). [resourcera.com]
But here’s what we do know:
The fastest-growing user shift to AI tools is happening specifically in informational, learning-oriented searches.
A 2025 behavioral study in the U.S. found that:
- Google’s share of general information queries dropped from 73% → 66.9% in six months,
- while ChatGPT’s usage for those same queries rose from 4.1% → 12.5%.
[clickmedialab.com]
This doesn’t mean Google is losing its upper funnel outright —
but it does mean the upper funnel is where people are experimenting with alternatives the fastest.
And that’s the key narrative point:
Users are not abandoning Google — they’re sampling different places to start their learning journey.
That’s exactly how Google once disrupted Yahoo and AltaVista.
AI search tools now echo the original promise of Google’s brand:
- clarity
- simplicity
- direct answers
- no ads
- a sense of neutrality
For discovery, for curiosity, for “help me understand this,” users are trying the option that feels more like early Google.
It’s a symbolic — and strategically significant — migration.
The Page One Problem (and Why It Hurts the Brand)
Even though we cannot state that Google’s informational share is collapsing, we can say this:
Page One no longer feels like a place designed purely for discovery.
The mix of ads, modules, carousels, shopping units, and visual clutter means that:
- Google remains strong when users have commercial intent
- but feels less intuitive when users want unbiased-feeling answers
And that distinction matters for a brand whose identity was built on neutrality.
Not because the results are paid.
But because the experience feels paid.
This is not corruption.
It’s the consequence of scale.
When your core revenue engine lives on Page One, Page One starts looking more like a monetized surface than a knowledge index.
That’s the real strategic mistake:
preserving short‑term revenue at the cost of long‑term brand coherence.
Google remains the place to go when you’re ready to buy.
But increasingly, it doesn’t always feel like the best place to learn.
Even if Google is still used for informational searches at massive scale, the perception that discovery is cleaner elsewhere is enough to weaken the brand — because brand is perception, not math.
Why This Matters for Google’s Identity (Not Just Market Share)
Google’s Brand ID has always rested on three pillars:
- Simplicity
- Neutrality
- User‑first clarity
The structural reality of Google’s business — one of the largest ad engines in the world — now pulls against those pillars.
AI search, meanwhile, aligns with them naturally.
And that’s the real full-circle moment:
AI tools are not just competing with Google as a search engine.
They are competing with Google as the embodiment of Google’s original brand.
Users aren’t fleeing.
They’re drifting.
Testing.
Comparing.
And they’re doing it exactly where Google built its earliest trust: the informational start of the journey.
This shift doesn’t need to be absolute to be meaningful.
It only needs to be perceptible — and it is.
A Soft Landing — If Google Chooses It
For now, the slip is small.
A few percentage points of behavioral drift here, a growing curiosity toward AI tools there. This isn’t a collapse; it’s a signal. And signals, when noticed early, are gifts.
Google hasn’t ignored the moment.
Its push into AI — from AI Overviews to Gemini integration — shows the company understands the terrain is shifting. But AI layered on top of clutter is different from AI built instead of clutter. And that’s the opportunity still in front of them.
Google’s brand was built on clarity, neutrality, and usefulness.
None of that is lost.
But the company must decide whether those values will continue to guide the experience — not just the messaging.
The good news?
There is still time.
The drift is reversible.
The identity is recoverable.
The trust is repairable.
And maybe this is the moment where Google, once again, gets to reinvent what search feels like.
What Do You Think?
I’d love to know your perspective:
- Do you feel Google’s search results are still serving you well?
- If you could advise Google directly, what would you tell them to change first?
- And where do you start your search journey today — Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, something else?
Your thoughts will shape the follow‑up piece.
Want More?
Join Me for the Next Article
In the next installment, I’ll explore:
“Brand Course Corrections: How Google Can Reclaim Its Identity in an AI‑Led World.”
If you’d like that delivered straight to your inbox, subscribe below — and let’s keep this conversation alive.
